Fredrik Lundh wrote: > M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > >> The results were produced by pybench 2.0 and use time.time >> on Linux, plus a different calibration strategy. As a result >> these timings are a lot more repeatable than with pybench 1.3 >> and I've confirmed the timings using several runs to make sure. > > can you check in 2.0 ? (if it's not quite ready for public consumption, > put it in the sandbox).
I'll check it in once it's ready for prime-time, either later today or early next week. You can download a current snapshot from: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/pybench-2.0-2006-06-09.zip -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Jun 09 2006) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ 2006-07-03: EuroPython 2006, CERN, Switzerland 23 days left ::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! :::: _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
