On 6/12/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, obviously I care since I wrote the PEP in the first place.
But I don't think this is trying to say they don't care. People just want to lower the overhead of maintaining the distro. Having to report bugs and patches to an external location instead of just getting to fix it directly is a hassle that poeple don't ask for. Plus it is bound to get forgotten by accident, so planning for it doesn't hurt.
-Brett
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Then I guess we should deal with before 2.5b1, and delay 2.5b1 until the
> status of each of these has been clarified.
>
> Each maintainer should indicate whether he is happy with a "this is
> part of Python" approach. If so, the entry should be removed from PEP
> 360 (*); if not, the code should be removed from Python before beta 1.
is this "we don't give a fuck about 3rd party developers and users" attitude
really representative for the python-dev community and the PSF ?
Well, obviously I care since I wrote the PEP in the first place.
But I don't think this is trying to say they don't care. People just want to lower the overhead of maintaining the distro. Having to report bugs and patches to an external location instead of just getting to fix it directly is a hassle that poeple don't ask for. Plus it is bound to get forgotten by accident, so planning for it doesn't hurt.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
