On 6/27/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My worry with this is that by providing checking functions that just return > true or false that people will rely on those too much and have logic errors > in their check and let security holes develop. That is why the checking > functions as they stand now are macros that do the error return for you.
Using a macro that returns an Error is OK. (Well, from this perspective; it might be a problem for reference leaks.) I just want a single call that does my erroring out, instead of two separate calls depending on whether the interpreter is trusted. -jJ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
