Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 6/28/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The workaround to replace __name__ with __module_name__ in order to
>> enable
>> relative imports turned out to be pretty ugly, so I also worked up a
>> patch to
>> import.c to get it to treat __module_name__ as an override for
>> __name__ when
>> __name__ == '__main__'.
>
> Ah, clever. +1.
In that case, I'll check it straight in. It was actually surprisingly easy to
do, given how finicky import.c can get (this particular change was able to be
handled entirely inside get_parent()).
>> So given a test_foo.py that started like this:
>>
>> import unittest
>> import ..foo
>
> Um, that's not legal syntax last I looked. Leading dots can only be
> used in "from ... import". Did you change that too? I really hope you
> didn't!
It's OK - I just spelt it wrong in the example. It should have said "from ..
import foo".
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
