> > That was a purely altruistic proposal. I've already > discovered that sets are finalized and that some code that > works with dict emulating a set may not work with a set. It > will not make much difference for me if my proposal will be > implemented in 2.6 or even in 3.0, but the sooner it will > happen the fewer people will stumble on the same problem that > I did. I also feel that dummy allocated on the heap and the > free set list are complicating the code with no gain. >
Can this not be resolved by carefully adjusting the order of finalization? If code can be bootstrapped it can be strootbapped. As a side note, is there a finalization order list for imported modules? Kristján _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
