Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> I believe that names in
> lambdas/nested-functions referring to local names in the outer scope should
> really be bound at function definition time
No, you don't want that, because it would make functions that
call each other very awkward to arrange.
> And it's also handy that the iteration variable of the for loop is
> accessible after the for loop is terminated (in fact, this specific
> behaviour is already listed among the wont-change for Py3k).
I'd just like to point out that the create-a-new-cell
behaviour that I have proposed for loop variables
*preserves* this ability!
for new i in range(10):
...
print i
will still print 9.
--
Greg
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
