Guido van Rossum wrote: > On 7/5/06, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> At 12:18 AM 7/5/2006 +0200, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> >I don't see anything else that's attractive. The realistic options are: >> > >> >1. do nothing >> >2. extend global's meaning >> >3. add outer keyword >> >> Did you also consider and reject: >> >> * Alternate binding operators (e.g. ":=", ".=", etc.) > > Brr. > >> * Alternate spelling of outer names when binding (e.g. ".x = whatever" to >> bind an outer x) > > We looked at and rejected "globals.x = whatever". I think the same > reasoning applies here. > >> If so, then these should probably be added to the "rejected alternatives" >> for Py3K so they don't get rehashed. > > Georgbot?
I added the alternative binding operators. The discussion about ".x" seems to be still in progress. Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
