Ka-Ping Yee wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>I think Talin's got a point though. It seems hard to find one short English
>>word that captures the essence of the desired behavior. None of the words
>>in his list seem strongly suggestive of the meaning to me. I suspect that
>>means one's ultimately as good (or as bad) as the rest.
>
>
> What's wrong with "nonlocal"? I don't think i've seen an argument
> against that one so far (from Talin or others).
Well, I just think that a fix for "an aesthetic wart" should be, well,
aesthetic :)
I also think that it won't be a complete disaster if we do nothing at
all - there *are* existing ways to deal with this problem; there are
even some which aren't hackish and non-obvious. For example, its easy
enough to create an object which acts as an artificial scope:
def x():
scope = object()
scope.x = 1
def y():
scope.x = 2
To my mind, the above code looks about as elegant and efficient as most
of the proposals put forward so far, and it already works.
How much are we really saving here by building this feature into the
language?
-- Talin
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
