At 01:30 PM 7/11/2006 -0400, Scott Dial wrote: >Phillip J. Eby wrote: > > A function's func_closure contains cell objects that hold the > > variables. These are readable if you can set the func_closure of some > > function of your own. If the overall plan includes the ability to > restrict > > func_closure setting (or reading) in a restricted interpreter, then you > > might be okay. > >Except this function (__getattribute__) has been trapped inside of a >class which does not expose it as an attribute. So, you shouldn't be >able to get to the func_closure attribute of the __getattribute__ >function for an instance of the Guard class.
That doesn't matter, because it's the *returned* function's func_closure that's at issue. That is, proxy_attr.func_closure[0] is the cell for the 'attr' value. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
