On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:29:22 -0300, Johan Dahlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I consider __getattribute__ a hack, being able to override __dict__ is less >hackish, IMHO. Why do you feel one is more "hackish" than the other? In my experience the opposite is true: certain C APIs expect __dict__ to be a "real" dictionary, and if you monkey with it they won't call the overridden functions you expect, whereas things accessing attributes will generally call through all the appropriate Python-level APIs. This makes sense to me for efficiency reasons and for clarity as well; if you're trawling around in a module's __dict__ then you'd better be ready for what you're going to get - *especially* if the module is actually a package. Even in "normal" python code, packages can have names which would be bound if they were imported, but aren't yet. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
