"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Neil Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Trent Nelson: >> >>> I ended up playing around with Profile Guided Optimization, running >>> ``python.exe pystones.py'' to collect call-graph data after >>> python.exe/Python24.dll had been instrumented, then recompiling with the >>> optimizations fed back in. >> >> It'd be an idea to build a larger body of Python code to run the >> profiling pass on so it doesn't just optimize the sort of code in >> pystone which is not very representative. Could run the test suite as >> it would have good coverage but would hit exceptional cases too >> heavily. Other compilers (Intel?) support profile directed >> optimization so would also benefit from such a body of code. >> > > GCC suppost profiling optimized code. Err... That was supposed to say "supports profile-optimized code". The rest of the message was indeed about Profile Guided Optimization in gcc.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
