On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 02:23:02AM +0200, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: > Gregory P. Smith schrieb: > > Sigh. Half the reason I did the hashlib work was to get much faster > > optimized versions of the hash algorithms into python. I'll be > > disappointed if that doesn't happen. > > Sad as it sounds, it appears you just did half of the work, then > (omitting the Windows build process).
I had no access to a windows build environment at the time (as many python developers do not). Apparently I neglected to bribe someone who did to do it after I checked the module in. ;) So is it worth my time doing this in a hurry for 2.5 or do other people really just not care if python for windows uses a slow OpenSSL? Widely deployed popular applications use python for both large scale hashing and ssl communications. If no, can this go in 2.5.1? Its not an API change. -g _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
