On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:04:16 -0400, "Phillip J. Eby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >PEP 302 doesn't need to be changed, since Python now conforms to it again. >That is, every object in sys.path_importer_cache is either an importer or >None. It's just that there is an additional type of importer there that >didn't occur before. If you have code that expects only certain types of >importers to be there, that code was already broken. >
Thanks. Jean-Paul _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
