Fredrik Lundh wrote: > "Chris S" wrote: > >> and while most users and the w3 spec >> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315#NoNSPrefixRewriting) >> agree this feature is actually a bug > > ET's not a canonicalization library, and doesn't claim to be one, so that > reference isn't > very relevant. And "most users" know that ET uses a simplified infoset; it's > not exactly > a secret.
And if you need an XML library with ET's API that does retain namespace prefixes and has support for canonicalization and a boatload of other features, you could try lxml. http://codespeak.net/lxml Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
