M.-A. Lemburg schrieb: >> It's either an official feature, with somebody maintaining it, >> or people should expect to break it anytime. > > I'll let you know when things break - is that good enough ?
That can't be an official policy; you seem to define "breaks" as "breaks in my (your) personal usage of distutils". While this is fine as an end-user point of view, it isn't useful as a maintenance guideline. In case you don't see what I mean: I said that something is already broken (bdist_msi), where "broken" means "doesn't work", and you said "it's only a small part". So if it's fine that only small parts break, I wonder where this gets us over time. For another example, you found that 2.1 compatibility is now broken (due to usage of True and False). When distutils was still listed in PEP 291, 2.1 compatibility was mentioned as a goal. Now, it doesn't seem to bother you very much that 2.1 compatibility is gone. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
