Re: [Python-Dev] gcc 4.2 exposes signed integer overflows

[Thomas Wouters]

On 8/26/06, David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

CPython should be fixed anyway. The correct fix is
"if (y == -1 && x < 0 && (unsigned long)x == -(unsigned long)x)".

Why not just "... && x == LONG_MIN"?

--
Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com