On 8/23/06, Phillip J. Eby wrote: > Our original > assumption was that if they could implement throw() then they could clearly > implement close(), since close() was defined in terms of throw(). An > asynchronous return might be another matter.
Such asynchronous return can always be implemented via a special hidden exception that is invisible to catch statements. I.e an implementation of generators can still use ___GeneratorExit internally as long as it is not exposed to scripts. Regards, Igor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
