Nick Coghlan wrote: > reversed(seq[start:stop:step]) becomes > seq[(stop-1)%abs(step):start-1:-step] > > An rslice builtin would make the latter version significantly easier to read: > > seq[rslice(start, stop, step)]
How would this deal with omitted start and/or stop values? -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
