On 9/8/06, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ensuring modifications to that array are atomic would be tricky, but I > think it would be doable if we use a read-copy-update approach (with > two alternating signal handler functions). Not sure how to ensure > there's no currently running signal handlers in another thread though. > Maybe have to rip the atomic read/write stuff out of the Linux > sources to ensure it's *always* defined behavior.
Doh, except that's exactly what sig_atomic_t is for. Ah well, can't win them all. -- Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
