Nick Coghlan wrote: > As for the reason: it makes it possible to use the same style for classes > without bases as is used for functions without arguments. Prior to this > change, there was a sharp break in the class syntax, such that if you got rid > of the last base class you had to get rid of the parentheses as well.
Is the result a new-style or classic-style class? It would be nice if using the empty parens forced a new-style class... -- Talin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
