Guido van Rossum wrote: > OK. Pronouncement: PEP 355 is dead. The authors (or the PEP editor) > can update the PEP. > > I'm looking forward to a new PEP.
It would be terrific if you gave us some clue about what is wrong in PEP355, so that the next guy does not waste his time. For instance, I find PEP355 incredibly good for my own path manipulation (much cleaner and concise than the awful os.path+os+shutil+stat mix), and I have trouble understanding what is *so* wrong with it. You said "it's an amalgam of unrelated functionality", but you didn't say what exactly is "unrelated" for you. Giovanni Bajo _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
