No objection on targetting 2.6 if other developers agree. Seems this is well under way. good work!
On 11/6/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tomer filiba wrote: > > cool. first time i build the entire interpreter, 'twas fun :) > > currently i "retained" support for __members__ and __methods__, > > so it doesn't break anything and is compatible with 2.6. > > > > i really hope it will be included in 2.6 as today i'm using ugly hacks > > in RPyC to make remote objects appear like local ones. > > having __dir__ solves all of my problems. > > > > besides, it makes a lot of sense of define __dir__ for classes that > > define __getattr__. i don't think it should be pushed back to py3k. > > > > here's the patch: > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1591665&group_id=5470&atid=305470 > > As I noted on the tracker, PyObject_Dir is a public C API function, so it's > behaviour needs to be preserved as well as the behaviour of calling dir() from > Python code. > > So the final form of the patch will likely need to include stronger tests for > that section of the API, as well as updating the documentation in various > places (the dir and PyObject_Dir documentation, obviously, but also the list > of magic methods in the language reference). > > +1 on targeting 2.6, too. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia > --------------------------------------------------------------- > http://www.boredomandlaziness.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
