Armin Rigo wrote: > Yuk! Not renamed to .py files. Distributing .py files that are > actually bytecode looks like a new funny way to create confusion. No, I > was half-heartedly musing about introducing Yet Another file extension > (.pyc for caching and .pyX for importable bytecode, or possibly the > other way around).
an alternative would be to only support source-less PYC import from ZIP archives (or other non-filesystem importers). </F> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
