> I question whether a distro built on Python can even afford to allow > 3rd party packages to be installed in their system's site-packages. > Maybe Python needs to extend its system-centric view of site-packages > with an application-centric and/or user-centric view of extensions?
Agreed, I do not think that should be allowed. A system site-packages directory for a python install is a convenient bandaid but not a good idea for real world deployment of anything third party. It suffers from the same classic DLL Hell problem that windows has suffered with for eons with applications all including the "same" DLLs and putting them in the system directory. I'm fine if an OS distro wants to use site-packages for things the OS depends on in its use of python. I'm fine with the OS offering its own packages (debs or rpms or whatnot) that install additional python libraries under site-packages for use system wide or to satisfy dependancies from other system packages. Those are all managed properly for compatibility at the OS distro level. Whats bad is for third party (non-os-distro packaged) applications to touch site-packages. -greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
