Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
> #1610575 suggests to introduce the 't' code to support the _Bool
> type where available, and uses char if it isn't available.
> 
> Any objections to adding it?

Not from me, although the patch should probably be extended to add a 
ctypes.c99_bool
(or how it would be named) type - see also the comments that I posted to
the tracker.

Thomas

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to