On 1/4/07, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 10:22:54AM -0800, Mike Klaas wrote: > > > [ 1598181 ] subprocess.py: O(N**2) bottleneck > > > > > >I submitted the trivial fix almost two months ago, but apparently nobody > > >feels responsible... > > Is Peter Astrand still actively maintaining the module? I've been > assigning subprocess bugs to him on the theory that he'll fix them. > If he's not around, we can apply patches to subprocess. (The problem > with subprocess in particular would be the difficulty of testing > changes that affect both Windows and POSIX code; I think relatively > few developers use both Windows and Unix.)
We have the buildbots to help with this. > We should also try to make an effort to go through the tracker and > look for bug fixes and patches suitable for 2.5.1. Definitely! I only did a really quick review. If you want someone to think about any of these, assign them to me with a priority of 9. I'll discuss with others and see if the fixes should go in to 2.5.1 or not. n _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
