On  12-Jan-2007, at 19:01 , Guido van Rossum wrote:

On 1/12/07, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Many types in Python are idempotent, so that int(1) works
as expected, float(2.34)==2.34, ''.join('hello')=='hello'
et cetera.

I'm not sure I understand the use case; I don't believe I've ever felt
the need for this.

I have oodles of routines of the form
def foo(thefile):
        if type(thefile) == str: thefile = open(thefile)
or
        if not hasattr(thefile, 'read'): thefile = open(thefile)
or something similar.

We should also consider the semantics in more detail. Should the seek
position be shared between the two objects? What about buffering?

That's definitely the hard part. But it's somewhat similar to "normal" mutable objects which are (I think always, right?) shallow copied when used in a constructor.
--
Jack Jansen, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack
If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to