"Josiah Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > "A.M. Kuchling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
| > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > | [*] Anyone else keep wanting to write "byte type"?
| >
| > All the other builtin types I can think of are singular.  So I think 
byte
| > should be also.
|
| But a "byte" already has a standard definition in the realm of computer
| science and/or programming, and that definition is singular.  No one
| will think that a byte is a container or a sequence (which is more or
| less what it is), they will think it is like a C 'char'.  Bytes, on the
| other hand, at least lets people know from the first read that it is a
| container or sequence of some kind.  Of what?  Bytes.

Okay, this pretty well convinces me.  Opinion withdrawn.

tjr



_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to