SVN rev 52305 resolved Bug #1545497: when given an explicit base,
int() did ignore NULs embedded in the string to convert.
However, the same fix wasn't applied for long().
n
On 1/13/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's wrong with this session? :-)
>
> Python 2.6a0 (trunk:53416, Jan 13 2007, 15:24:17)
> [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5363)] on darwin
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
> >>> int('123\0')
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> ValueError: null byte in argument for int()
> >>> int('123\0', 10)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '123\x00'
> >>> long('123\0')
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> ValueError: null byte in argument for long()
> >>> long('123\0', 10)
> 123L
> >>>
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/nnorwitz%40gmail.com
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
