On 2/10/07, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 03:35:29AM +0200, Yotam Rubin wrote: > >> Why don't you use Stackless? It's very simple, stable, and solves > >> quite completely the problems in writing concurrect code. > > > > That's a great point -- I'm not necessarily producing this to solve a > > problem I'm having. Rather, I think that the new language features in > > PEP 342 cry out for a batteries-included library that makes asynchronous > > programming both natural and easy. > > > Of course Stackless isn't quite fully integrated with 2.5 (yet). > > When did someone last suggest that Stackless become part of the core > CPython implementation, and why didn't that ever happen? >
Don't remember the "when". The "why" has always been that Christian's hacks into the core were complicated and he didn't even think integration was worth it. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
