Ben North wrote:
> Jack Jansen:
>
>> To me self.[method_name] = self.metadata.[method_name] looks better:
>> what we're doing here is more like dictionary lookup than calling
>> functions.
>>
> In the same way, though, would this be viewed as too similar to normal
> dictionary/list indexing?
>
I think that's its strength; it's pleasantly symmetric to using [] on a
dict:
dict attribute behavior
--------------------------------
[] .[] pulls out named thing, throws exception
on failure, no default, is an lvalue
.get() .getattr() pulls out named thing, returns default
value on error (specifiable as second
argument), not an lvalue
List comprehensions look like funny lists, generator expressions look
like funny expressions, I see no reason why attribute dereferencing
shouldn't look like funny dict dereferencing.
+1.
> What would the reaction be to
> obj.{member}
> instead? Braces are already used to construct dictionaries, so this has
> some of the right connotations.
-0.5. You're not constructing anything, you're looking up something.
For the record, I'm also -1 on the two-argument form--this isn't a
function call.
/larry/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
