Thomas Wouters schrieb: > > Sure, and I don't know if anyone will ever want ipow() -- but I've never > seen real code use the three-argument pow() either. The fact is that all > the in-place modifying hooks return the result (which may or may not be > self, and may or may not be mutated) so an in-place three-argument pow() > would have to do the same. I would prefer keeping the similarity between > __ipow__ and __pow__, although I don't care if that means keeping the > always-unused third argument to __ipow__ (which isn't really in the way, > after all) or adding a new hook for the three-argument pow().
It's in the way in the sense that slot_nb_inplace_power discards its third argument silently. That shouldn't happen, so I still prefer removing it throughout. Would you volunteer adding to fix that? Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
