Collin Winter schrieb: > But Pass, Break, Continue and Ellipsis aren't in the same category as > Add, Mult, Div, etc.. The former stand alone
That's not true. Pass, Break, Continue don't stand alone; they are members of the body sequence of some other statement (in particular for Break and Continue), you need some kind of loop around it. In any case, they are in the same category as they have no child nodes, which is a prerequisite for not creating objects. I can't see why the property "stand alone" should impact whether objects are created or not. > So: what if _ast.Add and co. were singleton instances of _ast.AST or > even of a subclass of AST, like _ast.Op? That way, we keep the > consistency that all AST nodes are instances of _ast.AST and I get the > nice property I'm looking for, ie, "node.op is _ast.Mult". I like this better. The base class you are looking for is _ast.operator; it should be already there (please do take a look at Python.asdl to see how I came to this conclusion, without studying the _ast module again). Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
