On Mon, Mar 05, 2007, Terry Reedy wrote: > > Tracker item review is an obvious bottleneck in Python development. > In particular, reviewing patches appears not to be nearly as > self-motivating as writing them, and other activities. So I think the > PSF should pay one or more people to do so. Possibly set up a patch > review fund and solicit donations. And, donators should get priority > attention to their submissions. For commercial developers, this would > probably be cheaper, given the value of their time, than reviewing > five other submissions.
There also seems to be a sense that we're waiting to get off SourceForge and using our own tracker. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "I disrespectfully agree." --SJM _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
