(Resending to python-dev instead of python-checkins) Any objections to applying something like the following to address the recent spate of buildbot failures in test_posixpath:test_islink?
Index: Lib/test/test_posixpath.py --- Lib/test/test_posixpath.py (revision 54248) +++ Lib/test/test_posixpath.py (working copy) @@ -150,6 +150,11 @@ os.remove(test_support.TESTFN) def test_islink(self): + try: + os.remove(test_support.TESTFN + "2") + except os.error: + pass + self.assertIs(posixpath.islink(test_support.TESTFN + "1"), False) f = open(test_support.TESTFN + "1", "wb") try: Collin Winter On 3/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of g4 osx.4 trunk. > Full details are available at: > http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/g4%2520osx.4%2520trunk/builds/1814 > > Buildbot URL: http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/ > > Build Reason: > Build Source Stamp: [branch trunk] HEAD > Blamelist: collin.winter,thomas.heller > > Build had warnings: warnings test > > Excerpt from the test logfile: > 1 test failed: > test_posixpath > > make: *** [buildbottest] Error 1 > > sincerely, > -The Buildbot > > _______________________________________________ > Python-checkins mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com