On 11 Mar, 10:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this seems useful to others, I could try to start a PEP on how the
process would work (but since I'm fairly new, it would be great if
someone could help out a bit by validating my verbiage against some of
the process requirements).
Isn't this PEP 297?
This does raise an interesting question, though, since I'm about to get
into PEP authorship myself. Have I missed an official way to propose
alternatives or resurrect a languishing PEP? I'd like very much to
propose to obsolete PEP 355 with twisted's FilePath object that I've
previously discussed, but ... does that mean adding text to 355?
writing a new PEP and referencing it?
Also, the language/library evolution PEP I would like to write is
basically an expanded version of PEP 5, but that is apparently moribund
(and "not followed", according to MvL).
Above all, how can I help to motivate timely yea-or-nay decisions from
the BDFL or "his chosen consultants"? PEP 1 seems to defer all of these
questions to emailing the PEP editor; is that really the best way to go?
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
