On 3/25/07, Mike Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From your proposal: > > > 2) In all modules, Follow the new RFC 2396 in favour of RFC 1738 and RFC > > 1808. > > The "new" RFC 2396 was superseded by STD 66 (RFC 3986) two years ago. Your > failure to notice this development doesn't bode well :) j/k, although it does > undermine confidence somewhat.
I apologize, Mike. I over-looked it and perhaps did not do sufficient research on the RFCs. I read through the RFC3986 and RFC3987, and have changed the proposal on changes urllib to be compliant with these current RFCs. > In any case, I have a few suggestions: Thank you for your suggestions. I went through your discussions on urllib utf issues and I think a careful study and discussions with people is much neccessary before any implementation thought. 4Suite.org references to RFC3986 comtible methods are helpful. With the comments incorporated, I have submited the proposal: http://puggy.symonds.net/~senthil/summer_code_urllib.txt Thanks, O.R.Senthil Kumaran http://phoe6.livejournal.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
