I think it's worthwhile. On 4/2/07, Trent Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > If you ask me, having it hosted by Trent is probably more helpful for > > its popularity than putting it in the Python source distro; the Tools > > directory is mostly a poorly-maintained collection of trivia I wrote > > many years ago that is now quietly gathering dust. > > > > (Not all of it, of course; there's some useful stuff there that I > > *didn't* write, which ended up there because it is either *used* by > > the distro (e.g. the compiler package support) or because the author > > needed a channel that guaranteed open source status (e.g. world and > > pynche). But Trent's which.py doesn't seem to fall in either > > category.) > > Agreed. However, I think my which.py might be a good candidate for the > stdlib (for Py2.6) as per python.org/sf/1509798 and could put together a > patch (along with test suite integrate and docs) if others think it > worthwhile. > > Trent > > -- > Trent Mick > trentm at activestate.com >
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
