Tim Peters wrote: > can wait a couple months, I'd be happy to own it. A possible saving > grace for ln() is that while the mathematical function is one-to-one,
I'm working right now in making the old operation to pass the new tests ok. Soon I'll cut a branch to work publicly on this (good idea from Raymond), and I'll be pleased to get your help here. Two months is ok: the "updated decimal" won't be finished before that. Thank you! -- . Facundo . Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
