Great -- if you target 2.6, it'll automatically be merged into 3.0 the next time somebody runs svnmerge. (Thomas?)
--Guido On 4/18/07, Jason Orendorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/17/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps a rewrite could target 3.0 and 2.6 could use a backported > > version of this *if* py3k compatibility mode is enabled? I'd love to > > see at least the 3.0 version cleaned up. > > A lot of these bugs can be fixed without forking. I've been > conservative so far. I looked at a diff this morning. Even > pickled documents shouldn't break. > > If this patch lands, I can look at further cleanup after that. > > Thanks everyone, > -j > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
