I'm +1 on the idea, but have no time to review the change. On 4/18/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander Belopolsky schrieb: > > Python allows arbitrary sequences after * in calls, but an expression > > following ** must be a (subclass of) dict. I believe * and ** should > > be treated similarly and since f(*UserList(..)) is valid, > > f(**UserDict(..)) should be valid as well. > > > > Of course, I can work around this limitation by writing > > f(**dict(UserDict(..))), but this is unnatural given that I don't have > > to do f(*tuple(UserList(..))). > > > > I have submitted a patch on SF that makes Python accept arbitrary > > mappings after **. > > Ping! Nobody interested in this? > > Georg > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org >
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
