> Just curious why 2to3 would not replace range() with list(range())? In most usages of range(), using the 3.0 range() will work just as well, and be more efficient.
If I wanted to write code that works in both versions (which I understand is not the 2to3 objective), then I would use range(). If I worry about creating a list in 2.x, I would write try: xrange except NameError: xrange=range at the top of the file. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
