Hoi, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen <at> xemacs.org> writes:
> > IMO that pair of examples shows clearly that, in this application, > reST is not an improvement over LaTeX in terms of readability/ > writability of source. It's probably not worse, although I can't help > muttering "EIBTI". In particular I find the "``'...'``" construct > horribly unreadable because it makes it hard to find the Python syntax > in all the reST. Well. That was a bad example. But if you look at the converted sources and open the source file you can see that rst is a lot cleaner that latex for this type of documentation. Regards, Armin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
