On Sat, Jul 14, 2007, Greg Ewing wrote: > Anders J. Munch wrote: >> >> How about .pyzip instead? To make it more obvious, and not >> mistakable for .py.z. > > Indeed. Is there any need to restrict extensions to 3 characters these > days? Last time I experimented with this on Windows, it seemed to > handle longer extensions okay.
ARAIK, the only disk fromat that really cares about this which may still be in widespread use is ISO-9660-formatted CDs without Joliet/Rock Ridge extensions. Also, it seems that memory sticks and USB thumb drives are often formatted with FAT because that's the closest we have to a universal file format. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ I support the RKAB _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
