Justin,
Yep, trying out an implementation is a good way. Please share your
thoughts as and when you are ready.
Cheers & good luck
<k/>
Justin Tulloss wrote:
>
>
> On 9/18/07, *Krishna Sankar* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Folks,
> As a follow-up to the py3k discussions started by Bruce and
> Guido, I
> pinged Brett and he suggested I submit an exploratory proposal. Would
> appreciate insights, wisdom, the good, the bad and the ugly.
>
>
> I am currently working on parallelizing python as an undergraduate
> independent study. I plan on first removing the GIL with as little
> overall effect as possible and then implementing a task-oriented
> threading API on top, probably based on Stackless (since they already
> do a great job with concurrency in a single thread).
>
> If you're interested in all the details, I'd be happy to share. I
> haven't gotten far yet (the semester just started!), but I feel that
> actually implementing these things would be the best way to get a PEP
> through.
>
> Justin
>
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
