I fully support removing all historic references from the 3.0 language
manual. Please do help out! You can just start putting patches ("svn
diff") into bugs.python.org; typically Georg gets to these very
quickly. Do use subversion, not the distributed tarbal (which was out
of date by the time it was uploaded to python.org. :-).--Guido On 9/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to help out cleaning up the Python3.0 documentation. There are a > lot of little leftovers from 2.x that are no longer true. (mentions of > long, callable() etc.) > > Ideally (especially in the tutorial), we should only refer to 3.0 features > and syntax, and keep the special cases and "other ways to do it" to a > minimum. > > Before I dive in and start submitting patches, what does everyone else > think? How much reference to previous python versions should be left in? > Does it make sense to keep notes of the nature of "since version 2.3 ..." > when there is an intentional discontinuity at 3.0? > > Peter Harris > > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
