On 10/12/07, Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shane Hathaway wrote: > > Shane Hathaway wrote: > >> I'm interested in seeing a good way to write tail calls in Python. Some > >> algorithms are more readable when expressed using tail recursion. > > > > About ten seconds after I wrote the previous message, I realized two things: > > > > - It's easy to write "return Return" instead of "raise Return". So > > "raise TailCall" is probably better. > > > > - I can write a complete implementation of this idea with nothing but a > > simple decorator. Check it out! > > With yet another 10 seconds, I realized my quick implementation actually > does nothing to optimize tail calls. Working on a fix.
Since they're not going to be accepted into python anyway, the implementation is off-topic for python-dev. Please take them up elsewhere (such as my offer to discuss in private.) -- Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
