Hm... [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced. I wonder what's going on there... On Dec 5, 2007 4:11 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 5, 2007 4:08 PM, Kevin Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2007 5:50 PM, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > At 10:48 PM 12/5/2007 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote: > > > >Neil Toronto schrieb: > > > > > So Jim and PJE finally convinced me to do it the right way. :) Thanks > > > > > guys - it turned out very nice. > > > > > > > >How does this relate to Armin Rigo's method cache patch? > > > > > > > >(http://bugs.python.org/issue1685986) > > > > Was there any reason (aside from the usual lack of volunteers for > > > review) why it didn't go in already? > > > I'm not sure-- I think folks were waiting for Raymond H. to evaluate it. I > > did my part to update Armin's patch against 2.4 to HEAD at the time and put > > in what cleanups seemed sensible. FWIW, I've been using an interpreter with > > this patch ever since without problems. > > I never even saw that one. I'm hoping Raymond will have another look. > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) >
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
