This post describes work aimed at getting Django to run on Jython: http://zyasoft.com/pythoneering/2008/01/django-on-jython-minding-gap.html
One outstanding issue is whether to use Java's ConcurrentHashMap type to underly Jython's dict type. See <http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap.html>. ConcurrentHashMap scales better in the face of threading because it doesn't lock the whole table when updating it, but iterating over the map can return elements in a different order each time. This would mean that list(dict_var) doesn't return values in the same order as a later call to list(dict_var), even if dict_var hasn't been modified. Why? Under the hood, there are 32 different locks, each guarding a subset of the hash buckets, so if there are multiple threads iterating over the dictionary, they may not go through the buckets in order. <http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp08223/> discusses the implementation, at least in 2003. So, do Python implementations need to guarantee that list(dict_var) == a later result from list(dict_var)? --amk _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
