[Raymond] >> There should probably be a PEP sets clearer guidelines about what should be >> backported from Py3.0. >> >> Perhaps something like this: >> * If there is a new feature that can be implemented in both and will make >> both more attractive, then it should be in both. >> * If something is going away or changing in 3.0, then the 2.6 conversion >> tool mode should warn about it if possible. >> * If neither of the above apply, then leave 2.6 alone.
[Guido van Rossum] > Can you volunteer a draft? It could be PEP 3003. I'm probably too > close to 3.0 to be able to objectively write this, which really > represents end users' desire for stability in 2.6. Yes. Will do. Raymond _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
